would wel agre wyth him. For so may euery worde almost 
     through the whole scripture, calling an allegory euerye 
     sense, wherby the wordes be translated vnto some other 
     spirituall vnderstanding, beside the true playne open 
     sence that ye letter firste entended. But on the other side 
     because yt in some wordes of scrypture is there none 
     other thing entended but an allegorye, to goe therfore 
     and in another place of scripture to take away wyth an 
     allegory, the very true litteral sense as he doth here, thys 
     is the faute that we fynde in hym. Whych if it may be 
     suffered, must nedes make al ye scripture as touching 
     anye poynte of oure fayth, of none effecte or force at all. I 
     meruaile me therfore much that he is not aferde to 
     affirme that these wordes of Christe, of his bodye and hys 
     bloode, must needes be vnderstanden onely by way of a 
     similitude or an allegory as ye wordes be of the vine and